Tuesday, September 02, 2014

The Newest Ferguson Racial Fairy Tale from Communist Berkeley Prof (Pardon the Redundancy): Racist Black Robbers, Would-be Cop-Killers, Rioters, Looters and Arsonists were Just Responding to Bad Municipal Election Scheduling, and Expressing Their Rage at the Lack of Sufficient Numbers of Black Policemen!

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks to reader-researcher AL, who writes,

Lazy: It is not that the election is rigged as is suggested. It is because the local blacks are lazy and do not vote in local elections.

In the last local election only 6% of the blacks eligible to vote bothered to vote. Bothered.

As if it was some sort of terrible chore.

Since when do communists believe in free elections, in the first place? This complaint by Sarah Anzia is just blowing smoke. She can’t possibly be so stupid as to actually what she is asserting.

Sarah Anzia: Unfair election rules stack the deck against Ferguson's blacks
August 30, 2014 4:00 pm
Sarah Anzia | assistant professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and author of "Timing and Turnout"
The Cap Times
(2) Comments

Even after the unrest in Ferguson has subsided, we're left with questions about the tension that built up and exploded in the small St. Louis suburb. [What “tension”? A racist black thug and suspected murderer robbed a non-black merchant, and then tried to murder a white cop. When he failed, his black criminal comrades terrorized non-black merchants, as a show of support. None of these mopes would be voting, no matter what day municipal elections were held on. They probably didn’t even know who the mayor was, or who ran against him.] Among those questions: How did a city where two-thirds of the residents are black elect an almost entirely white city government? The answer is simple: Ferguson holds its city elections entirely separate from state and national elections, and that can make all the difference.

People rarely think about the timing of elections. But Missouri's election rules set the stage for the discontent that has tormented Ferguson recently. [Gimme a break!] The state requires its cities to hold elections in April, when there are no state or national offices on the ballot to draw voters to the polls. As a result, turnout is low. In Ferguson, turnout in the most recent election was an abysmal 12 percent, and best estimates indicate that white residents participate at much higher rates in the city's elections than black residents. [Thus, we must punish whites for being more civic-minded than blacks.] White residents were three times more likely to vote than black residents in the April 2013 municipal election, according to a Washington Post analysis of Catalist data. Suddenly, it is much less surprising that Ferguson has a white mayor, five out of six council members are white, and its 53-member police force has only three black officers.

[What does the make-up of the police force have to do with electoral results, as opposed to blacks not serving on the Ferguson PD because they are anti-law enforcement, too dumb to pass the exam, have no desire to deal with Ferguson’s black thugs (and thus get LEO work elsewhere, or are ineligible to apply, due to being convicted felons? But let’s linger by her claim that Ferguson’s blacks are upset at the lack of black local policemen. ]

The pronounced effects of off-cycle election timing extend far beyond Ferguson. Researchers Zoltan Hajnal and Jessica Trounstine have shown that cities with low turnout tend to elect fewer minority city council members.

[“Have shown”? As if this were something we needed “scholars” to “show”?!]

My own research [Ha, hah, ha! She’s just kidding, folks. Communists don’t do research.] has found that off-cycle election timing increases the political influence of various groups that are highly motivated and well-equipped to mobilize their supporters, such as teachers unions in school board elections and police officers and firefighters in city elections. For example, in school districts that hold off-cycle elections, teachers are paid significantly higher salaries than in school districts that hold on-cycle elections. Exactly who wins and who loses from off-cycle election timing differs from place to place, but when elections are off-cycle, small groups [like whites!] can have a big impact — and be rewarded handsomely with favorable public policies.

Moreover, the election timing rules of Missouri are not unusual. As of 2012, 21 states required all of their municipal elections to be held off-cycle, and almost all of the remaining states had at least some cities with off-cycle elections. A mere five states required that municipal elections be held on the same day as national elections. Off-cycle timing and low turnout in municipal elections are the norm in the United States — not the exception.

[She doesn’t realize that that refutes her thesis. She said that Ferguson’s riots were due to what she calls “off-cycle” elections. But if that were true, every city in America would be exploding, just like Ferguson.]

If Ferguson's elections were simply rescheduled to coincide with national elections, turnout in the city's races would more closely mirror the significantly higher turnout of national races. In California, turnout is a whopping 36 percentage points higher in cities that hold elections on the same day as presidential elections than in cities that hold off-cycle elections. In Minnesota, turnout is 22 percentage points higher in on-cycle school board elections than in off-cycle school board elections. Timing is the most important factor in explaining why turnout is low in some cities and high in others.

While rescheduling local elections would attract a broader, more representative slice of the eligible electorate, and drive policies that more closely reflect the preferences of citizens, there are some downsides. Off-cycle local elections became a standard during the early 20th century, when progressive reformers argued that local issues and policymaking are sufficiently different from state and national ones that the elections should be held separately. Combining local, state and national elections also creates significant administrative hurdles and exhaustingly long November ballots in even-numbered years. But the benefits of higher turnout and stronger local democracy far outweigh the costs of dealing with those hassles.

The solution may be simple, but the politics of changing local election timing is anything but. The groups that benefit from low turnout lobby hard to keep off-cycle elections in place — and thus to protect their advantage. And legislators charged with setting election schedules listen to those groups, because those on the other side — those who would benefit from a switch to on-cycle elections — are typically unorganized and inactive.

With the spotlight on Ferguson, people are calling for explanations. Ferguson's warped political structure can be largely explained by a simple electoral rule that locks in low turnout — not just in Ferguson, but in literally thousands of American municipalities and school districts. It is time for that to change.

Sarah Anzia is assistant professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley and the author of "Timing and Turnout: How Off-Cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups." This column first appeared in The Washington Post.

Guadalupe County, Texas: The Late Enebelio Garcia Brought a Knife to a Gun Fight

By A Texas Reader

The Texas Rangers are investigating the death of a man who was shot Friday evening while allegedly charging at Guadalupe County Sheriff's deputies with a hatchet-like tool. Enebelio Garcia, 45, was first pepper-sprayed by the deputies, but that didn't…

Monday, September 01, 2014

Whatchoo Lookin’ at? Man with Homicidal Hair-Do Arrested on Suspicion of Drunk Driving in Fort Worth


I was about to say that this is a gang-banger with a sense of humor, but then I took a look at his killer’s eyes, as cold and dead as a four-day-old mackerel. He probably wears that crazy hair-do as a provocation, to help him decide whom to murder next.

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks to reader-researcher RC for this story.

Fort Worth police arrest driver with intimidating haircut
By Ryan Wood
11:23 a.m. CDT September 1, 2014

FORT WORTH — A man arrested on suspicion of drunk driving has a scream-worthy haircut.

Norberto Barron-Melendez's booking photograph showed off a monster design shaved into his head. Two hands "grasped" the sides of Barron-Melendez's head. What appears to be the creature's face stared out from the man's forehead.

Fort Worth police arrested Barron-Melendez early Sunday morning for drunk driving after he was seen driving the wrong way at the intersection of Main Street and Long Avenue.

Memphis: Surveillance Footage Shows Blacks Brutally Beating 73-Year-Old Black Man; No Elderly White Men were Available

By David in TN

A 73-year-old black man beaten by the Usual Suspects. “The Community” is completely indifferent, as we've seen hundreds of times.

At Action News 5 - Memphis, Tennessee.

What Did Lee Atwater Really Say?

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

What Did Lee Atwater Really Say?

By John Hinderaker
June 9, 2013
Power Line

I was blissfully unaware of Lee Atwater’s most famous quote (or alleged quote) until I ran across it in connection with Martin Bashir’s demented claim that Republican criticisms of the IRS are “racist.” Bashir explained that everything Republicans do or say is racist, regardless of whether there is any apparent connection to race. As authority, Bashir cited Lee Atwater, the most successful Republican campaign manager of his time. In Bashir’s words, “Mr. Atwater revealed how Republicans evolved their language to achieve the same [i.e., racist] purpose.” This is the quote that Bashir attributed to Atwater, from a 1981 interview:

You start out in 1954, by saying n*****, n*****, n*****. By 1968, you can’t say n*****, that hurts you, back-fires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states rights, and all that stuff and you’re getting so abstract. Now you’re talking about cutting taxes. We want to cut this is much more abstract than even the busing thing and a hell of a lot more abstract than n*****, n*****.

That strikes me as falling far short of the significance Bashir and other leftists have attributed to it, but I was curious enough to track down the original audio of the interview. You can listen to it at The Nation. It turns out that the Atwater quote is very famous indeed. The Nation tells us that it was used in at least ten books published in 2012 alone.

The audiotape is of a conversation between Lee Atwater and two men: Professor Alexander Lamis, who first quoted the now-famous paragraph in a book, and a second man named Saul. It is 41 minutes long, with occasional interruptions. The quality is sometimes poor, but it is generally easy to make out. The subject of the interview was contemporary politics in the South, and the main point that Atwater made is that race is no longer a major issue in Southern elections:

From 1954 through 1966, race was THE issue [in the South]. …

In 1980, I think the crucial thing in 1980 is, the two dominant issues in southern politics, which had been race and party–you had to be a Democrat to win–are pretty well resolved. And the main issues became the economy and national defense.

Atwater explained that the “Southern strategy” of the 1970s included, in his view, coded racism, but that there was no racial element in Reagan’s 1980 campaign:

So what you have is two things happening that totally washed away the Southern strategy, the Harry Dent type Southern strategy, and that is, that whole strategy was based, although it was more sophisticated than a Bilbo or a George Wallace, it was nevertheless based on coded racism. The whole thing, busing, we want a Supreme Court judge that won’t have busing, anything you look at can be traced back to the issue [of race], in the old southern strategy. It was not done in a blatantly discriminatory way.

But Reagan did not have to do a southern strategy for two reasons. Number one, race was was not a dominant issue. And number two, the mainstream issues in this campaign had been, quote, southern issues since way back in the sixties. So Reagan goes out and campaigns on the issues of economics and of national defense. The whole campaign was devoid of any kind of racism, any kind of reference. And I’ll tell you another thing you all need to think about, that even surprised me, is the lack of interest, really, the lack of knowledge right now in the South among white voters about the Voting Rights Act.

So the central point that Atwater made in the interview was the exact opposite of the proposition for which liberals have endlessly quoted him. Lamis, however, wanted to find some role, even if a modest one, for race:

Q: I’m just wondering how much residual there is called racism in the anti-government, anti-Washington, states rights, return to states rights, de-federalize, cut social programs–how much is a residual of the old days in the antipathy towards welfare programs, poverty programs, and other political, social, economic programs which give power to black folks, or poor folks…and it’s not purely southern, but the Legal Services Corporation giving problems to municipalities in Mississippi that want to gerrymander, and those types if things.

A: Well, sure, OK, but I think this, and don’t get me wrong. You go to these white country clubs and they’ll say, shit, I’m tired of them getting everything and all that. But the bottom line is, it’s a mainstream thing now. It’s not grounded in racism, as much as it is on account of the Network movie syndrome, I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. Now, statistically, the poor people, the people receiving all these things, are black. Now, some of the Southern stuff may still be racism, but it’s such a widespread thing now, I think it’s almost developing into a class struggle type issue rather than a racism issue.

Later in the interview, Atwater (a skilled blues guitarist who recorded with B.B. King) repeated his belief that race is no longer a significant element in Southern politics:

My generation will be the first generation of southerners that won’t be prejudiced, totally….But what I am saying is that that has really been sublimated by a bunch of other issues.

Atwater explained that white blue collar workers are (or were as of 1981) the South’s key swing voters. Until recently, the standard way to win their votes was via the race issue (a technique, by the way, that was pioneered and perfected by Democrats). But no more:

We’re leading up to my whole strategy in the deep south in 1980, which…the whole focus group in the south was that blue collar worker. Now that’s important when you tie it back to the racist thing, because he is also the guy who is most threatened by the black, and is also the most prone to be, quote, a racist. And until 1980, and a little bit in 1976, the race issue was how you approached that vote. Plus, the most conservative guy on fiscal matters always got his vote, and the toughest son of a bitch on foreign policy matters got his vote. …

Q: But [Reagan’s] not going to lose the south if he goes along with what the blacks want on voting rights, is what you’re saying?

A: That should be a thrust of his. In 1968, the whole southern strategy that Harry and those put together, the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the south. Now they don’t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the south is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he’s campaigned on since 1964. And that’s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cutting taxes, you know, the whole cluster, and being tough on national defense.

Lamis was obviously not a Reagan voter, and he pushed back against Atwater’s view that the Reagan campaign in the South was free of any racial element:

Q: But might there–I’m not saying that he does this consciously–but the fact is that he does get to the Wallace voter, and to the racist side of the Wallace voter, by doing away with legal services, by doing away with, cutting down on food stamps–

At this point, Atwater interrupted and gave his famous answer, portions of which have been widely quoted. Let’s parse it:

A: Here’s how I would approach that issue as a statistician, a political scientist–or no, as a psychologist, which I am not, is how abstract you handle the race thing.

It is not clear what Atwater meant by “abstract” here. In the context of everything else he has said about Southern politics, and about the fact that in 1980 the issues that dominated elsewhere–the economy and national defense–also dominated in the South, I think he meant something like “universal.” In other words, are appeals to white Southerners specifically based on race, in a way that historically would not have been attempted in other regions, or are they based on the same issues, promoted in the same language, as elsewhere in the U.S.?

In other words you start out in — now y’all don’t quote me on this–

Atwater apparently said “don’t quote me on this” because he was about to use the word “nigger.” Lamis quoted him anyway.

…you start out in 1954 by saying nigger, nigger, nigger. By 1968 you can’t say nigger, that hurts, there’s a backlash, so you say stuff like forced busing, states rights and all that stuff. And you’re getting so abstract now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all of these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it, I’m not saying it.

This last statement is key, but is never quoted by liberals. Atwater has already said several times during the interview that race is no longer a significant element in Southern politics. Here, he specifically disclaims agreement with the proposition that Reagan’s policy positions contained a subconscious appeal to racial prejudice. That was Professor Lamis’s suggestion, not his. But he goes on to make the argument that even if some voters draw a subconscious connection between, say, cutting the food stamp program and race, the absence of any specifically racial appeal shows what a minor factor race has become in Southern politics:

But I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract and that coded, then we’re doing away with the racial problem one way or another. You follow me? ‘Cause obviously sitting around saying, we want to cut taxes, we want to cut this, and we want–is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than nigger, nigger. So any way you look at it, race is coming on the back burner.

Liberals like Martin Bashir cite this interview for the proposition that Republicans skillfully conceal appeals to racism in seemingly innocuous policy discussions. Obviously, Atwater said nothing of the sort. And he declined to agree with Professor Lamis’s suggestion that Reagan’s talk about cutting programs like legal services and food stamps “gets to” the racist side of the George Wallace voter, albeit unconsciously. “I’m not saying it.” What Atwater did say, repeatedly and unambiguously, is that racial prejudice no longer plays a significant role in Southern elections, and that Reagan won the South in 1980 on the same issues with which he swept the rest of the country: the economy and national defense. It requires a great deal of dishonesty to twist Atwater’s words into the exact opposite of what he actually said.

Listen Up, White Man! Pay Attention to the Black View on Whites’ Attempts to Help Blacks

By Nicholas Stix

Louis Alfred • Mix/Mastering Engineer, Producer at Music Production Engineer - Production Consultant

Are you born stupid or do you think the rest of the world is especially black people...because you don't use the words of race directly but come with a thinly veiled attempt at making race a subtext argument or issue in any way diminishes the impact?...Like major league pitcher its called a "fast ball" and that is what this is. The fact that you are trying to make it palatable is not nearly as ingenious as Mr. Atwater's. He doesn't get a "go pass" and you certainly don't. Liberals never got this wrong. The strategy in its passions is about race. At its genesis it is supported by the issue race and even if you try and change the window dressing on this "mutt" its still a dog and peripherally and collaterally race is involved. No need to "pad" the discussion if it wasn't about race the thrust of the message would be different. In english the queens english its called connotation. Leave the "Jedi" mind tricks to Obi Wan Kenobi. He was waaaay better at it.
Reply • Like • 2 • January 14 at 10:23am

N.S.: Were you born a racist, or did your parents raise you to be one?

I keep trying to explain to nice white folks what’s really going on. They keep thinking that it if they just ignore race, that racist scum like you will treat them with respect. I try to explain to them that mopes like you will just hate them, all the more, and seek to rape them and slit their throats.

Like I always say, everything I know about segregation and racial supremacism, I learned at the foot of blacks.

But I don’t go around saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger,” not even in private, because I don’t want to sink to your level, Mr. Alfred. But there are different angles at work, here.

[Not that I’m even writing this for your sake, since you are beyond hope. Rather, I’m thinking aloud, for the sake of white readers who can still be saved.]

There are people who go around saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger,” all day long, in public. Those are blacks. My experience is that at least half of the two million blacks in New York City say “nigger” 1,000 time a day, i.e., New York City blacks say “nigger” 1,000,000,000 times a day in public.

What sort of a group of people obsessively say the worst term about them? Only blacks.

What kind of group obsessively projects their own racism onto the very group that seeks to help them? Only blacks.

On the one hand, I don’t say “nigger” as a matter of manners and aesthetics. I can hear the black supremacist Alfred screaming, “What about as a matter of morality?!”

If black supremacists spend their days and ways, shouting “Nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger!,” then clearly this is not a matter of morality, though it may be one of power.

On the other hand, I have no doubt that if whites went around saying “Nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger,” that blacks would show them a great deal more respect than they presently do.

Thus, as a matter of means and ends, there is certainly an argument to be made for whites saying “nigger.”

Rob Bennett

A black colleague once told me that everyone's racist to some degree….

Louis Alfred •

Correction.....Everyone is prejudiced to varying degrees...everyone anyone can be a the western hemisphere and on the continent of a product of whites Americans and Europeans...>Africans have a cultural bias towards other Africans and certainly towards us we being looked down upon as "mutts" for having survived slavery. This I have found in encounters with some Nigerians. As far a Obama and race is concerned what these conservatives don't realize is they are regurgitating every attitude that was foisted upon leaders in the Civil Rights movement and any African American from Jesse Owens to the Tuskeegee Airmen to Jackie Robinson. If they aren't so racist if the characterization is so off the mark why do keep hearing the same garbage coming out of their mouths....politicians and "good ole' Amerikkkan [!] Patriots alike?...quick to quote King as of late but he also stood for some of the same issues they hate currently...sorry but the hypocrisy is staggering.

Dallas: Antonio Barrera-Hernandez Stabbed to Death Outside of North Oak Cliff Night Club

By A Texas Reader

In the heart of the barrio.

Police say Antonio Barrera-Hernandez was stabbed about 11:10 p.m. during a fight outside a night club in the 300 block of S. Beckley Ave., near the intersection of West Jefferson Boulevard. The 36-year-old was taken to Methodist Hospital, where he died.

No Rest for the Weary on Labor Day: 2 Dead, 22 Wounded in Holiday Weekend Shootings in Chicago

By A Texas Reader

At NBC Dallas-Fort Worth.

Obama Voters Anonymous (Cartoon)


Labor Day, 2014: Rick Santorum is Showing Signs of Immigration Sanity



By Nicholas Stix


Sunday, August 31, 2014

Carjacking Victim Run Over, Stabbed Repeatedly in Lancaster: Sheriff’s Dept.



Did Bill Clinton Convert Hillary from Strict Lesbianism to Bisexuality?

By Nicholas Stix

Does this man have magical powers?


Stand with Rep. Steve King Against Dictator Obama’s Illegal Mass Amnesty

By Nicholas Stix

San Antonio: Another Raceless, Nameless Perp Sought in Double Shooting

By A Texas Reader

Which is a wee bit funny, as his photo is shown.

[N.S.: The EN’s overmatched editors were apparently caught between revisions. Just imagine what it must be like to be one of the SAPD’s “editors,” constantly having to convert rapes into misdemeanors, and murders into manslaughters?]

Man sought in shooting of two children
By Mark D. Wilson : August 30, 2014 : Updated: August 30, 2014 11:28pm
San Antonio Express-News

Photo By Courtesy SAPD
Suspected shooter Joe Ramos Mercado.

SAN ANTONIO — A man was on the run Saturday after two children were shot in the head during a domestic disturbance on the Southeast Side.

Both are expected to survive, police said.

The shooting happened about 1 p.m. in the 200 block of Anton Drive.

A boy, 6, and a girl, 11, were rushed to area hospitals with multiple gunshot wounds after shots were fired at a car in which they were sitting during an argument between their mother and a man with whom she was in a relationship.

Police were seeking Joe Ramos Mercado in connection with the shooting. He is described as in his 30s, about 5-foot-11 and weighing about 200 pounds.

The children and their mother weren't identified.

Police said a man had been arguing with the children's mother in the moments before the shooting.

The mother got into a tan Kia Forte with the children and attempted to leave. As she did, the man allegedly grabbed a handgun from inside the house and began firing at the vehicle with the woman and the children inside.

Witnesses reported hearing six to seven gunshots.

A neighbor who requested not to be identified said she saw the mother scream and run toward a nearby house with a child in her arms.

After firing on the family, police said, the man jumped into the Forte and fled on Anton Drive toward Goliad Road.

The girl was grazed on her head, among other wounds, but is expected to recover. She was taken to University Hospital.

Police said the boy was in critical condition and underwent surgery at San Antonio Military Medical Center shortly after the shooting.

When apprehended, police said, Mercado will face two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.


Twitter: @MDWilsonSA

Ann Coulter and Her Christian Critics

Excerpted by Nicholas Stix

I planned to respond to my critics this week, but, unfortunately, there’s nothing to respond to. They call me names, say I’m cruel, malicious, not a Christian, compare me to Howard Stern and cite the titles of my books as if they are self-refuting. (Zippy, aren’t they?)

In other words, it feels like a book tour….

Read the whole thing at VDARE.

The War on Women (Poster)


Hispanic Man Killed in San Antonio Hit ID’ed

By A Texas Reader

“A man killed in a West Side home-invasion that police said appeared to be a “hit” has been identified. Cipriano Aguillar, 20, was shot to death in an apartment in the 2500 block of Suzette when two masked gunmen entered the apartment and opened fire….”

Cowardly Christians and Conservatism, Inc.

By Nicholas Stix


The Obvious Solution to ISIS


“ISIS fighters hold their weapons as they stand on confiscated cigarettes before setting them on fire in the city of Raqqa,April 2, 2014. REUTERS/Stringer”

By Nicholas Stix

At Ex-Army Libertarian Nationalist.

Saturday, August 30, 2014

St. Louis Rams End Michael Sam Publicity Stunt, Cut Incompetent Activist; MSM Give Propaganda Cover for Move; Rams Coach Jeff Fisher Says All the Right Things



Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

I tried many times to get the URL to the page, but it kept freezing, which also occurred when I tried to leave comments. I left a few, but lost about 90 minutes of my life. The Houston Chronicle Web page is loaded up with bad script, which constantly caused my pc to freeze, even after shutting down Mozilla, and even shutting down and re-booting my pc altogether. At present, a bunch of militant homosexualist commenters have moved in, with their Orwellian tactics, claiming to care only about football, asserting that Sam was a serious prospect before he came out, and denouncing real fans for not caring enough about the game.

Rams cut Sam, 1st openly gay player drafted
By R.B. FALLSTROM, AP Sports Writer | August 30, 2014 | Updated: August 30, 2014 5:27 p.m.
AP-Houston Chronicle
Comments [over 100]

Former Missouri player Michael Sam watches pregame festivities before the start of the South Dakota State-Missouri NCAA college football game Saturday, Aug. 30, 2014, in Columbia, Mo. Sam, the first openly gay player drafted by an NFL team, was released by St. Louis Rams Saturday. (Photo by L.G. Patterson/AP)

[ST. LOUIS (AP) — The St. Louis Rams cut Michael Sam, the first openly gay player drafted by an NFL team. Coach Jeff Fisher repeated over and over that it was purely a football decision.

"I will tell you this: I was pulling for Mike," Fisher said at news conference on Saturday. "I really was, and I don't say that very often. Mike came in here and did everything we asked him to do."

The seventh-round pick has been forthright and confident as his progress was watched as closely as any rookie in the league. He has been cheered by athletes and celebrities. In the end, the defensive end couldn't make a team stocked with pass rushers and lost out to undrafted Ethan Westbrooks, who proved more productive and more versatile.

Sam still has a chance to get picked up by another team or to make the Rams' practice squad. Wherever he lands, Fisher said "there will be no challenge, no challenges whatsoever" for the team that signs him.

"He's not about drawing attention to himself," Fisher said. "He kept his head down and worked and you can't ask anything more out of any player for that matter."

[Right. He only made a national spectacle out of himself, in order to get himself drafted.]

On Twitter, roughly an hour after he was cut, Sam wrote "The most worthwhile things in life rarely come easy, this is a lesson I've always known. The journey continues."

He also thanked the Rams and city of St. Louis on Twitter, adding that he looks forward to a long and successful career.

Earlier Saturday, he attended Missouri's opener in Columbia, a 1 1/2-hour drive west on I-70 from Rams Park. He was introduced to the crowd in the end zone alongside defensive E.J. Gaines, a sixth-round pick who made the team.

Sam blew a kiss and waved to the crowd, then walked back to the sideline. He posed for a few pictures then started looking at his phone and headed for the locker room.

Fisher personally delivered the news to the 20 others released in meetings Friday and Saturday, but Sam learned via cell phone. Fisher plans to meet with Sam on Sunday.

"He said 'Yes sir,' and he said, 'I understand.' He said, 'Thanks for the opportunity,' and I said, 'Mike, I'm looking forward to visiting with you tomorrow,' and he goes, 'I am, too.'"

The Rams selected Sam, the SEC co-defensive player of the year at Missouri, with the 249th overall pick out of 256 overall. After he was picked, he kissed his boyfriend as a national television audience looked on, and arrived brimming with confidence and with a quick retort for anyone who contended he was in the NFL only because he came out.

["[H]e kissed his boyfriend as a national television audience looked on….” “He's not about drawing attention to himself.”]

Fisher was proud to have made the landmark pick, but he made clear from the start that he chose Sam because he thought he had the talent to make it.

[My b.s. detector just exploded.]

The cameras followed, but the extra attention did not seem to faze Sam or his teammates. Veteran defensive end Chris Long noted rosters are always made up of players from different backgrounds. Players said Sam was part of their family.

Fisher called the draft pick a "second historic moment" for a franchise that signed running back Kenny Washington in 1946 as the league's first black player in the modern era, but he was most interested in describing Sam as a way to upgrade the Rams' defense. So was general manager Les Snead, who referred to Sam after the draft as a "designated pass rusher." Sam shed weight to be faster for special teams duty, reporting at 257 pounds, but Fisher said after the preseason opener that Sam would have to make the team based on defensive end play.

Sam had a sack in that game and said afterward, "You know, I can play in this league. I can play in this league."

Sam came out publicly following his final season at Missouri, though he had told his teammates before it began. The Tigers went on to tie a school record with 12 wins. Sam had 11 1/2 sacks and the lightly-regarded Tigers won the SEC Eastern Division, a huge step forward after going 5-7 during the first season in their new conference.

"If you look at our season, it didn't hurt us at all," recalled cornerback E.J. Gaines, a fellow rookie and former Missouri teammate. "If anything, it brought us closer."

Sam was lightly regarded out of Hitchcock, Texas, a town of about 7,000 along the Gulf Coast about 40 miles southeast of Houston. His first two years at Missouri, Sam backed up Aldon Smith and Jacquies Smith, both of whom are in the NFL.

From the start, teammates seemed to like having Sam around. [Who are you kidding?!] His energy was infectious and, if there were problems, they stayed behind closed doors. Publicly, Sam was just another late-round pick trying to make the Rams, which, like other NFL teams, held sensitivity training [!] early in camp. The Oprah Winfrey Network put off a planned documentary on Sam, saying it would allow him to focus on his dream of making the team.

At one point, Sam's Rams jersey was the No. 2 seller among rookies online, trailing only Cleveland's Johnny Manziel, and Sam was among just 10 draftees selected by the NFL to be featured on commemorative coins. Sam headed to the ESPY Awards to pick up the Arthur Ashe Courage award. He got a hug from Hall of Famer Jim Brown on his way to the stage and fought back tears throughout his speech. [Jim Brown: Still a cancer on the NFL.]

He told the audience: "Great things can happen when you have the courage to be yourself."

As Reward for Corrupting Her Own Corruption Prosecution of Black Supremacist Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price, Obama and Holder Appoint Affirmative Action Mediocrity Sarah Saldana to New Job, Tasked with Subverting the Nation’s Immigration Laws




[Previously, at WEJB/NSU:

“Black Supremacist Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price Has a History of Racist Violence While in Office.”]

By A Texas Reader

No bias here, right?

A token Mexican with a federal government job moves to another federal government job? And her new job is charged with enforcing this country's immigration laws, i.e., forcibly deporting millions of her fellow La Raza parasites.

Not only this, but the federal prosecutor's Dallas office has botched the investigation into the corruption of Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price.

Everyone in Dallas knows Price is just as corrupt as Ray Nagin, former mayor of New Orleans.

Ditto Kwame Kilpatrick, former mayor of Detroit.

So, why the delay in Price's trial date?

[N.S.: John Wiley Price is the most notorious black supremacist in Dallas. I am convinced that he is a member of the genocidal Nation of Islam.]

“Dallas prosecutor Sarah Saldaña is headed for one of toughest federal jobs.”

New York Mets Skipper Terry Collins: With the Steady, Deliberate Approach that We (GM Sandy Alderson and Me) are Taking, We Expect the Team to be a Contender by the 2034 Season


Mets GM Sandy Alderson, left, and Terry Collins

By Nicholas Stix
Video here.

Allah is Great! It’s National Bacon Day!

By Nicholas Stix


Nothing brings different faiths and cultures together, like bacon!


Give your sweetheart roses!

About 50 lbs. of holiness!

A devout Moslem brings out the holiday sacrifice

Moslem Baconites prostrate themselves in Midtown Manhattan, in celebration of Bacon Day!

If Mohammed were still alive, he’d eat a pound of bacon today, in celebration of the holiest day of the year!
(From the Jyllands-Posten)

Why Malls Die

By Robert Schöpfer Oculus III
May 17, 2012

[Re: “Dallas Mall Seeks to Cheat Death.”]

NorthPark mall is perhaps the finest indoor shopping mall in America, and it has long been a haven of calm, couth, and civilized behavior. But once the local transit authority built a light rail station nearby, the mall has been suddenly flooded with packs of cruising Negroes.

And, as always, Negroes = Trouble.

You have to understand the demographics of Dallas to get the true impact of this story. NorthPark is the Vatican of White Dallas. It is the last refuge of the White World, the last place a white Dallasite could go to escape the creeping horror from the south side of town. It is populated mainly by upper-class white ladies of the Junior League type, clean-cut white professional men, and the creamy-skinned, blonde-haired, white honey-pie daughters of same.

And then the authorities built a high-speed rail line linking this oasis of White civilization with the darkest heart of Ooga-Booga Land. Imagine running a pipeline for raw sewage into Saint Peter's and you'll get the impact the rail station has had on NorthPark.

But the 'Park is a high-end outfit. The tenants are Barneys, Neiman's, Nordstrom, Tiffany, and lots of high-end boutiques. The people that shop there are not Wal-Mart customers. They are not used to Negro behavior. They live in all-white enclaves and send their kids to all-white schools. To them, blacks are either Cool, like the models in the Italian suit ads they see in Town & Country; Cute, like the artfags, gay Negroes, and clowns they see at gallery shows, in chic clubs, and on TV; or they are Cowboys -- that is, professional athletes. The typical NorthPark shopper knows only the "theoretical Negro," the Negro that they have experienced second-hand. They have no knowledge of what American black people are really like.

And now they are finding out. Hence, the new rules.

There was once a time when Dallas whites could have pulled off a gimmick like this policy. The cops and judges were all white, after all, and the local media could be counted on to look the other way. Those days are over. You can expect to see protests, marching, and Angry Negroes on TV demanding an end to this "outrage" any day now. Local professional rabble-rouser John Wiley Price will attack some North Dallas soccer mom's SUV as she pulls into the parking structure. A visit from the Rev. Al, the Rev. Jesse, and the SPLC may follow. The media will descend on the story of the "Mall That Hated Black People" like a flock of vultures.

And the next thing you'll see is the white owners of NorthPark on TV, announcing the end to this "misguided and unfair" policy, and sacking the ceremonial Fall Guy.

And then NorthPark will go the way of Red Bird Mall, Town East, Valley View, Vista Ridge, and so many other area shopping centers: it will be overrun by Negroes, then by cholos, then by tweakers. The fights come next. Then somebody gets shot. Barneys, Neiman's, Nordstrom and Tiffany decamp for Allen or McKinney, or whatever small town the white people are fleeing to.

And finally NorthPark will die. Its corpse may live on as Plaza de la Raza or Saigon Shopping City, but the NorthPark we all knew, loved, and grew up in will be dead and gone.

Because of Negroes. Because we wouldn't keep out the Negroes.

Black Supremacist Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price Has a History of Racist Violence While in Office

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Of course, his violent assaults and batteries against whites just make him all the more popular among his black supremacist constituents.

Today in Dallas photo history – 1991: County Commissioner John Wiley Price involved in downtown scuffles

By Jerome Sims / Photo Librarian
7:00 am on August 2, 2013
Dallas Morning News


Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price is held by Dallas Morning News security guard Clayton Leffall as jogger Larry Buck sits on the curb at Young Street on Friday after a scuffle. TDMN staff photo by Richard Wright

From The Dallas Morning News, August 3, 1991

Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price was involved in two altercations Friday afternoon that could result in the filing of assault charges against him. A man involved in one of the fights suffered a broken ankle.

The man, a carpenter, was working on a movie set at the Dallas County Administration Building at the time. The fight started after Mr. Price and workers argued over construction equipment that was blocking the street.

That incident occurred about 90 minutes after Mr. Price fought with a jogger during a protest outside the offices of WFAA-TV (Channel 8) and The Dallas Morning News.

[Price doesn't "fight" with whites, he sucker punches or jumps them.]

Both men said they wanted to press charges against Mr. Price, but police were investigating the incidents and said they probably wouldn’t decide until next week whether to file assault charges against the commissioner.

Tim Short, a carpenter on the set of the movie Ruby, was released from Baylor University Medical Center Friday evening after treatment for a broken right ankle, a sprained right thumb and cuts and bruises, hospital officials said.


Mr. Short and Mr. Price have words. TDMN archive photo [That would presumably be before Price broke Short's ankle.]

That incident began shortly before 1:30 p.m. as Mr. Price stopped his car on Elm Street while movie workers moved materials and equipment out of his way. Mr. Price said he had to slam on his brakes when a workman sawing wood in the street stuck out a board.

“The guy didn’t say “excuse me’ or nothing,’ Mr. Price said.

After parking his car on an adjacent lot, Mr. Price approached the men. Accounts of what happened next differ.
Mr. Short, 32, said he tried to intervene when Mr. Price and another construction worker began arguing about the equipment.

“I tried to tell him we’re not a problem, that we’d get out of his way,’ Mr. Short said. “But Price pushed me forward and started choking me.’

Mr. Price said the workers attacked him.

“I went around there to talk to them about blocking the street, and they advanced on me,’ Mr. Price said.

The commissioner said that one worker attacked him, and that he grabbed the man by the neck and rammed him into the sidewalk. A second worker then grabbed Mr. Price, and the man he was holding tried to knee him in the groin, the commissioner said.

“I just came unglued and started punching and kicking,’ Mr. Price said. “The fight was on.’

Employees in Mr. Price’s office who said they witnessed the fight said several of the men were on top of Mr. Price. They also said the movie workers had “mouthed off’ to the commissioner as he waited in his car for them to move the material and again when he approached them.

“I wasn’t really paying any attention to that,’ Mr. Price said. “I started paying attention when they advanced on me.’

However, Mr. Short said the commissioner accused the workers of being white racists and shouted profanities at them. Mr. Price then began choking and punching him, Mr. Short said. He said a woman with Mr. Price hit him over the head several times with a purse.

“They kept backing up and it threw me into the curb,’ Mr. Short said. “That’s when I heard my ankle snap.’

Bruce Richardson, an artist on the movie set, said the two-term commissioner was angry as he approached Mike Fisher, the production company foreman, and began to argue with him. He said Mr. Short tried to persuade Mr. Price to leave Mr. Fisher alone.

“He (Mr. Price) lunged into him and started choking him,’ Mr. Richardson said. “He (Mr. Price) put him in a choke hold and they were wrestling all over the ground. Price’s people kept yelling, “Come on, John, stop it.’ ‘

Court records show that Mr. Short was arrested on charges of aggravated assault and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in 1977 but that the charges were dismissed. He received a probationary 60-day jail sentence for theft in 1977 and was found not guilty on a 1981 assault charge.

Mr. Short could not be reached to comment on those incidents.

Police said they did not arrest Mr. Price after the confrontation because they didn’t fear he would flee and were unclear of the circumstances of the fight.

Police Lt. Kirk Stewart said felony assault or Class A misdemeanor assault charges could be filed, depending on the severity of Mr. Short’s injuries.

The distinction between felony and misdemeanor charges could be significant because state law bars convicted felons from holding elective office.

The main difference between the charges is the degree of injury. According to statutes, felony aggravated assault may be charged when the victim receives a “serious bodily injury,’ defined as an injury that poses “a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.’

“I guess a broken ankle could be serious bodily injury,’ said Assistant District Attorney Mike Gillett, noting that there are numerous cases interpreting the meaning of that phrase.

Additional charges alleging assault of another construction worker involved in the fight also could be filed against the commissioner, Lt. Stewart said.

Police also may file assault charges against Mr. Price in connection with the earlier incident involving a jogger Friday during the protest outside WFAA and The News. Mr. Price and supporters have been demonstrating almost daily outside the television station, which they accuse of insensitive news coverage and discriminatory hiring and promotion practices.

The jogger, Larry Buck, 40, of Lancaster said he was tackled and beaten by Mr. Price as the jogger ran through a group of pickets on Young Street in front of the newspaper.

“I saw a big circle and a big gap (in the crowd), and joggers don’t like to take any extra steps, so I just tried to go through the gap,’ Mr. Buck said immediately afterward. “Mr. Price then body-slammed me to the ground. . . . He attacked me for no good reason.’

Some protesters said the jogger started the incident.

“The guy tried to run over our children,’ said the Rev. Robert Hadley, past president of the Dallas chapter of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. “He almost ran over me. I ducked out of the way, and he ran into John.’

Mr. Buck, who said he regularly jogs past the building, said Mr. Price should have let him pass through the picket line.

“He had no reason to do that,’ said Mr. Buck. “They have no right to block the sidewalk. I am going to press charges against him.’

Mr. Buck was not seriously injured.

Mr. Price is appealing a February conviction on misdemeanor criminal mischief charges. That stemmed from a Dec. 7 incident in which he damaged the windshield wipers of a Plano woman’s van during a demonstration at the Dallas offices of KXAS-TV (Channel 5).

Last summer, Dallas police Officer Robert Bernal accused Mr. Price of threatening him with a submachine gun after the officer shouted an obscenity at the commissioner. The two men later apologized to each other, and no criminal charges were filed.

Staff writers Al Brumley, Todd Copilevitz, Joseph Palmore, Jason Reid and Pete Slover and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

The Degeneracy of Conservatism

By Nicholas Stix

At Ex-Army Libertarian Nationalist.

Fred Siegel on the Moral Bankruptcy of the War on Poverty

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Fred Siegel
The Poverty of Benevolence
Fifty years of the Great Society have made things worse for blacks, not better.
2 July 2014
City Journal

Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make it Harder for Blacks to Succeed, by Jason Riley (Encounter Books, 205 pp., $23.99)

A half-century ago, the Great Society promised to complete the civil rights revolution by pulling African-Americans into the middle class. Today, a substantial black middle class exists, but its primary function has been, ironically, to provide custodial care to a black underclass—one ever more deeply mired in the pathologies of subsidized poverty. In Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make it Harder for Blacks to Succeed, Jason Riley, an editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal who grew up in Buffalo, New York, explains how poverty programs have succeeded politically by failing socially. “Today,” writes Riley, “more than 70 percent of black children are born to unwed mothers. Only 16 percent of black households are married couples with children, the lowest of any racial group in the United States.” Riley attributes the breakdown of the black family to the perverse effects of government social programs, which have created what journalist William Tucker calls “state polygamy.” As depicted in an idyllic 2012 Obama campaign cartoon, “The Life of Julia,” a lifelong relationship with the state offers the sustenance usually provided by two parents in most middle-class families.

Riley’s own life experience gives him powerful perspective from which to address these issues. His parents divorced but both remained attentive to him and his two sisters. His sisters, however, were drawn into the sex-and-drug pleasures of inner-city “culture.” By the time he graduated from high school, his older sister was a single mother. By the time he graduated from college, his younger sister had died from a drug overdose. Riley’s nine-year-old niece teased him for “acting white.” “Why you talk white, Uncle Jason?” she wanted to know. She couldn’t understand why he was “trying to sound so smart.” His black public school teacher similarly mocked his standard English in front of the class. “The reality was,” Riley explains, “that if you were a bookish black kid who placed shared sensibilities above skin color, you probably had a lot of white friends.”

The compulsory “benevolence” of the welfare state, borne of the supposed expertise of sociologists and social planners, undermined the opportunities opened up by the end of segregation. The great hopes placed in education as a path to the middle class were waylaid by the virulence of a ghetto culture nurtured by family breakdown. Adjusted for inflation, federal per-pupil school spending grew 375 percent from 1970 to 2005, but the achievement gap between white and black students remained unchanged. Students at historically black colleges and universities, explained opinion columnist Bill Maxwell, “did not know what or whom to respect. For many, the rappers Bow Wow and 50 Cent were as important to black achievement as the late Ralph Bunche, the first black to win a Nobel Peace Prize, and Zora Neale Hurston, the great novelist.”

“Why study hard in school,” asks Riley, “if you will be held to a lower academic standard? Why change antisocial behavior when people are willing to reward it, make excuses for it, or even change the law to accommodate it?”

In the 50 years since the start of the Great Society and the expenditure of more than $20 trillion to alleviate poverty, millions of newcomers have entered America from Asia and from Africa. They generally arrived in poverty and have improved themselves by dint of self-help and hard work—those boring middle-class values that President Obama’s mentor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, denounced so strenuously. But if, as Riley demonstrates, the Great Society programs have failed in conventional terms, they have been an overwhelming political success. Together, government workers and the recipients of government benefits make up a formidable voting bloc. Yet their very political success may also prove their undoing: President Obama’s share of the African-American vote increased between 2008 and 2012, but during that period, blacks’ share of the national income declined and their unemployment rate increased.

“Everybody has asked the question,” Frederick Douglass said in an 1865 speech, “‘What should we do with the Negro?’ I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall. . . . And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs!” A century and a half later, Jason Riley echoes that advice.

Fred Siegel is a City Journal contributing editor and the author of The Revolt Against the Masses.

Another “Family” of Foreign Invader-Grifters Sues the American Taxpayers for Millions

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks to A Texas Reader, who wrote,

Doesn't the scientific method, and thus modern medicine, reflect the "hegemony of the white race"?

So, shouldn't this parasite have been given a potion made of cacao beans, and sent on his way?

He should have received medical care appropriate to what the Aztecs would have provided him.

Note that this “family” has already ripped off the American net taxpayers for hundreds of thousands of dollars. If anyone should be getting sued, it’s this woman.

Family of Immigrant [sic] Detainee Sues President Obama, Government for Wrongful Death
August 29, 2014 6:03 PM
Reporter Amy Johnson

LOS ANGELES ( — A [foreign] local family says it will sue President Barack Obama and several federal agencies because their loved one, an [illegal alien] immigrant being held in various detention centers, died while waiting to get medical treatment.

[Illegal alien] Nancy Luna fought back tears Friday as she discussed her husband’s [?] ordeal. At a news conference Friday, attended by CBS2’s Amy Johnson, Luna said her husband had Type 2 diabetes, and his care was neglected.

[The criminal Nancy Luna spoke entirely in Spanish. After ten years of living here illegally, the woman doesn’t speak a word of English, but she has the welfare mentality down pat! And why is she named “Luna,” if she was married to Aguilar Batista? Were they even married?]

He was held at the Metropolitan Detention Center, among other places.

Last March, Roberto Aguilar Batista, 38, died from complications of diabetes at the Dalby Correctional Facility.

“It’s so tough, because he was so young,” said Batista’s [illegal alien] niece Esmeralda Aguilar. She said her uncle was constantly writing letters.

“He was letting [his wife/CBS] know it was really tough in there. That he didn’t want to be in there,” said Aguilar.

Batista lived in the LA area for 10 years with his [illegal alien] wife and two [illegal] daughters.

He was arrested in June 2013 on suspicion of entering the country illegally.

[The accompanying video doesn’t say “on suspicion,” but simply that he was arrested for “entering the country illegally.” Adding “on suspicion” makes it sound like a non-immigration crime, where you get the presumption of innocence. But there’s no presumption of innocence for illegal aliens. If you’ve entered the country legally, you simply show the immigration authorities your visa, work permit, or green card, and they leave you alone, without arresting you. This mope was arrested, because he was guilty of being an illegal human being.]

His family says at the Metropolitan Detention Center he was denied proper care and developed kidney damage, a heart attack and blindness.

[Then he shouldn’t have broken into our country. He should have remained in the country which alleged reporter Amy Johnson refused to name, assuming she even asked Miss Luna where she and her “husband” were from, and gotten its free, world-class medical care.]

Batista was moved to three other facilities before his death.

“They gave me another medicine,” Batista wrote in a letter read by his attorney, James Segall-Gutierrez, “that de-controlled my sugar levels.”

In a letter a month before he died, he complained of not receiving proper medical care and also asked for an attorney.

The family’s attorney has filed a civil-rights complaint against Obama, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration Customs Enforcement, the Department of Justice, the Metropolitan Detention Center and the Giles Dalby Correctional Facility.

[I know what you’re thinking—it’s poetic justice, that “Obama” and his goons should get a taste of their own medicine.]

“Everybody, even if they are undocumented, is entitled to civil rights,” said Segall-Gutierrez.

[Wrong! Illegal aliens are most certainly not entitled to civil rights. Civil rights are the rights due to citizens.]

“A man has died; he left his [illegal alien] family, two children and a loving wife,” Segall-Gutierrez said. “Unacceptable.”

The attorney said he plans to go to Washington and serve the president.

“The only reason I’m filing against the president of the United States is that he is the figure head [sic] of the United States,” Segall-Gutierrez said, “for violating the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and particularly the article which states we would live in peace.”

[The lawyer is a liar. If anyone violated the treaty, it is his client. But at least he gave away that the grifters are Mexican, in spite of Johnson’s attempt to cover that up.]

Johnson reports there has been no comment from any of the agencies named in the complaint.

Cops Shoot 18-Year-Old, Unarmed White 16 Times, Killing Him, Two Days Before He was to Start School (Not a Hypothetical or Satire)


The late Joseph Jennings

By Nicholas Stix

At Expose Them All.

Disappearing Murders… in San Antonio

By Nicholas Stix

“Last year, there were 45 slayings in San Antonio through the end of August that were classified by the Police Department as murder investigations, according to data SAPD reported to the FBI. This year’s stats are, so far, much higher but still less than 2012, when the department reported 65 murder investigations through August.

“The numbers do not include slayings classified as justified homicides or manslaughters.” [“Two dead in morning shooting” by Alia Malik, San Antonio Express-News, August 28, 2014; updated August 28, 2014 7:15 p.m.]

Disappearing murders! Just turn them into manslaughter.

RNC Eunuchs Know How to Show Those Dastardly Democrats!


Friday, August 29, 2014

The San Antonio Hate Crime Murder that the Local Media Have Given the “Gentle Giant” Treatment, and that the National Media Have Refused to Report on at All (My New VDARE Report is Up!)


Joseph Keith Richard

“San Antonio’s Unarmed Black ‘Gentle Giant’ Occasions No Riots—Just Beats White Victim to Death with Fists” (read the whole thing here).

Michael Joseph Fobbs Jr.

The Banality of Racism: Black Supremacist Big League Star Adam Jones Condemns White Fans for Cheering on Black Little Leaguers



By Nicholas Stix

He's not man enough to just admit, "I hate white people."

At Countenance.

Obama’s “Children,” Criminal Invaders Seek to Take Over Lynn, MA; “Children” Signing Up for Public Schools Have Gray Hair, and “More Wrinkles than” the Mayor, but Obama Illegally Forbids City Officials from Verifying Their Ages!


Foreign criminals demonstrating in Lynn, MA, on August 28, 2014

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks to Brad Morris, at Round Up and Deport Every Illegal Alien in the USA.

I believe that Obama's order forbidding Lynn officials from verifying the ages of its newest illegal aliens is itself illegal.

Illegals Swamp Blue Collar City
By SFC Drake | 3 comments
Aug 28, 2014
DML Daily

Obama administration is dumping hundreds of Guatemalan migrants into the blue-collar town of Lynn, Mass., boosting its education costs, forcing cuts in government services, and helping raise rental prices for Americans, according to the city’s mayor.

Many “are illiterate in both English and Spanish [and] the odds of us getting them to pass a 10th grade math test are negligible,” Judith Flanagan Kennedy, the mayor of Lynn, told reporters.

Most of the city’s residents “are very afraid to speak publicly about it, because they don’t want to be branded as a racist,” Kennedy said.

But the voters tell her, via letters, emails and conversations, that “they are very concerned about the number of people coming in,” she said.

“They want to see it stopped. They’re glad I’m speaking up about it,” she said.

The mayor of says that some of the illegal aliens from Guatemala who are enrolled in her city’s public schools are adults with graying hair and “more wrinkles than I have.”

“They are not all children,” Judith Flanagan Kennedy told reporters at a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. She added that the federal government will not allow school officials to verify their ages, even though one of the students turned out to be 35 years old. “We were told through a directive from the Department of Justice (DOJ) that we were not to question or verify – attempt to verify these ages,”

Kennedy said that the majority of those from Guatemala who are enrolling in the Lynn Public Schools claim to be between 14 and 17 years of age.

“But there were people with graying temples, hair around the temples,” said Kennedy, adding that although she did not see these individuals in person, she saw photographs of them in registration paperwork. “There were people with more wrinkles than I have around their eyes.”

Ezell Ford: Yet Another Unarmed Black Man Murdered by Racist Cops?



By Nicholas Stix


Ferguson: Genocidal Nation of Islam’s New Black Panther Division Calls for Finishing Mike Brown’s Job, and Murdering White Officer Darren Wilson (Video)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

A tip ‘o the hate to Conservative Free Thinkers.

Published by Jim Hoft, on Aug 16, 2014.

The New Black Panthers are raising HELL in Ferguson, Missouri on Saturday night

N.S.: Although the criminal incitement to violence in the video above took place 13 days ago, note that the Mike Brown Hoax had already been completely debunked by then. Note too that the police’s passive resistance strategy, instead of defusing matters, led to two weeks of riots.

See my blog devoted to the NOI’s murdering ways: The Zebra Project.

India: Witches Burn Indian Man Alive in Front of His Family

By “W”

News from the largest democracy in the world….”Give me that old time religion….”


Breaking News: Was Michael Brown Already a Killer, When He Tried to Murder White Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson?


Charles Johnson, editor-in-chief of GotNews, filed a lawsuit in St. Louis seeking the release of Michael Brown’s juvenile criminal record, claiming they no longer need to be kept private. Johnson says law enforcement told him that Brown’s juvenile arrest record contains a second-degree murder charge and information linking him to the notorious Crips street gang.

Read more here.

Immigration-Related Double Murder in San Antonio

Two dead in morning shooting
By Alia Malik, San Antonio Express-News : August 28, 2014 : Updated: August 28, 2014 7:15pm


A woman grieves where San Antonio police are investigating the scene of a double shooting Thursday August 28, 2014 on the 2500 block of Suzette on San Antonio's West Side. The shooting took place about 4:00 a.m. when two men entered an apartment and shot a couple to death. The shooters fled the scene in a dark SUV. A 22-year-old woman was killed and a man in his 20s was also killed. (Photo By JOHN DAVENPORT/San Antonio Express-News)

SAN ANTONIO -- The last time Imelda Adalee Rincon’s father saw her, he and his girlfriend had bought her groceries.

“She gave us a kiss goodbye,” said Yvette Garza, the nine-year girlfriend of Imelda’s father, Hector Rincon.

Hours later, two masked gunmen kicked in the door of the West Side apartment where Imelda Rincon, 22, lived with her boyfriend and shot the couple to death.

“Numerous” shots were fired at about 4 a.m. at the apartment in the 2500 block of Suzette Avenue, said Lt. Michael King of the San Antonio
Police Department. One person was found dead in the bed, while another was found dead outside the bed in the bedroom, King said.

There was no evidence of a robbery, King said. Police are investigating the double-slaying as the 59th and 60th suspected murders this year.

“They intentionally came into the apartment with the intent of killing two individuals,” King said. “It doesn’t look random. It looks like something that would be consistent with a hit, but we don’t know that for sure.”

The unknown gunmen drove away in a dark SUV, according to police. A few minutes later, officers found a small SUV on fire in the 2400 block of Pinn Road, near the crime scene. King said authorities do not yet know if the blaze was related to the shooting.

Several witnesses were taken to the homicide office to give statements. According to police, family members might have known the couple was in danger. But Imelda Rincon’s father said Thursday that he did not.

“I don’t know why they killed my daughter,” he said in Spanish, before tears came to his eyes. “She wasn’t in a gang.”

Imelda Rincon does not appear to have a criminal history, according to public records. Her father described her as a hard-working young woman who worked every day at a nearby bingo hall on Marbach Road. She was a graduate of Memorial High School.

The couple said they did not know Imelda Rincon’s boyfriend well. They knew him only as “Chucho.” Authorities have not yet released his identity.

Before daybreak, a woman ran through the crime scene tape, screaming, “No,” before police got her to stand back.

She wept loudly and said, “Where’s my baby?” while another woman held her and said, “We don’t even know if it’s him yet.”

[Donde es mi bebe?!]

A neighbor, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation, said he thought jealousy — rather than gang violence — was the motive for the killing. He said groups of men, and officers, had mistakenly knocked on his door looking for Imelda Rincon.

The neighbor said he and Imelda Rincon were friends and that she had recently broken up with another boyfriend to be with her current one.
The neighbor described Imelda Rincon as outgoing and friendly.

“It’s just sad that it happened to her,” the neighbor said. “She was a good person.”

Last year, there were 45 slayings in San Antonio through the end of August that were classified by the Police Department as murder investigations, according to data SAPD reported to the FBI. This year’s stats are, so far, much higher but still less than 2012, when the department reported 65 murder investigations through August.

The numbers do not include slayings classified as justified homicides or manslaughters.

[Disappearing murders! Just turn them into manslaughter.]

Thursday’s incident is one of several this summer that have left police dealing with crime scenes involving multiple bodies.

In June, Zachary Manciu, 19, and Michael Moore, 20, died in a shootout following an alleged robbery gone awry.

Moore and Joseph Michael Kirschberg, 21, were trying to rob the apartment where Robert Payne, 20, lived, officials have said. Payne, who had barricaded himself in his bedroom with a shotgun, called Manciu for help, but when Manciu arrived the two suspected intruders ordered him to kick down Payne’s door, police said.

Payne opened fire on his friend, believing him to be an intruder, officials have said. In the shootout that ensued, Moore was also shot and killed. Kirschberg was later arrested and has been charged with capital murder.

Last month, Hector Davila, 44, is believed to have killed his wife and daughter — Irma Davila, 41, and Destiny Davila, 13 — before shooting and killing himself at their West Side home.

Staff Writer Drew Joseph contributed to this report.

Twitter: @AliaAtSAEN

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Are These Hot Dutch and Russian Police Persons Actresses, or Just Auditioning for Sugar Daddies? (Rule 5 Draft Pics)


Dutch girl, via The Daily Caller


Russians, via The Moscow Times

Have you ever tried to cuff a bad guy who didn't want to get cuffed? I have.

Sorry, but all these girls are good for, gun or no gun, is as Moslem gang-rape-bait.

Family of Mexican Invader-Terrorist Who Tried to Stone Border Patrol Agents to Death, and Died When They Killed Him in Self-Defense, is Suing the Agent and the Feds for $40 Million

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks to A Texas Reader.

The mentality is the same as with blacks: Whitey must pay, and pay, and pay. He must pay by letting us rob him of his country, and if he should defend his country, then he must pay even more, forever!

Family of Mexican man killed by Border Patrol suing for $40M
By Jason Buch
August 27, 2014 : Updated: August 27, 2014 4:29pm
San Antonio Express News

The family of a Mexican man shot and killed by Border Patrol agents today sued the officials involved and the U.S. Government for $40 million.

The family of Guillermo Arevalo Pedraza are suing Agent Christopher Boatwright and his supervisors over the September 2012 killing of Arevalo on the banks of the Rio Grande in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico.

At the time, Border Patrol said the agents were responding to rock throwers on the Mexican side of the river. On Wednesday, Arevalo's family said Boatwright's shooting from a boat was unprovoked.

At a news conference, Corpus Christi attorney Bob Hilliard acknowledged that Border Patrol has changed its policies, but said the high dollar amount of the lawsuit was to ensure Border Patrol agents are deterred from unnecessary use of deadly force. [So, he hasn’t even the pretext of a fairy tale of a rationalization.]

[N.S.: So what are the policies now? Do BP officers have to run away from the rocks, or stand there and let themselves be slaughtered?]


Unbelievable! The guy is trying to sneak into this country illegally, is killed by authorities in the act of committing a crime and his family is not only suing but suing for more money than he would have made in several lifetimes.

News on Genocide in South Africa

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks for this article to Brad Morris at Round Up and Deport Every Illegal Alien in the USA.

Architects of the Slow War against White South Africans

August 24, 2014 at 12:57 p.m.

Architects of the Slow War against White South Africans

Since the fall of Apartheid in 1994 South Africa has seen an explosion in violent crime and in 20 short years has become the rape and murder capital of the world. This under the rule of the African National Congress (ANC).

The Urban Dictionary defines a Slow War as a war that is only visible when the big pattern is revealed over time. If you could play the seemingly-isolated events of a Slow War in speeded-up time, its real nature would be visible.

A Slow War is the opposite of the Blitzkrieg. A war so slow that you hardly notice it. A war so slow that those waging it can deny that it is actually happening. Under the fog of war they hide it as “ordinary crime”.

The end result is still the same as the Blitzkrieg. Total annihilation of the enemy.

Signs of the Slow War against Whites in South Africa:

  • Afrikaans schools and universities forced to become English and taken over by blacks.
  • Afrikaans language disappearing from television.
  • Whites forced out of the civil service in their hundreds of thousands and replaced by incompetent blacks.
  • Names of towns and streets replaced with the names of Marxist terrorists.
  • 4000 white farmers killed.
  • 40,000 whites robbed, raped, tortured and murdered in their homes.

Read More on “The South African Slow War

One group has suffered greatly and their situation is getting worse by the day. Being a farmer in South Africa is officially the most dangerous job in the world. In fact you are 2.2 times more likely to be murdered as a SA farmer than a SA police officer is.

The South African farmer’s murder rate is 220 in 100,000. South Africa has been ruled by the African National Congress since 1994. In 1997 the government had the opinion that farmers were uniquely being targeted for murder.

South Africa’s then minister of safety and security Sydney Mufamadi established the joint task force of police, military and organized agriculture to develop a plan to protect farmers. It became the Rural Protection Plan and commando groups were tasked to protect the farmers.

In 1999 a “priority committee on rural safety” was created to ensure rural crime prevention strategies were treated as a national security priority. In 2001 police established an independent committee of inquiry into farm attacks. As a result from 2001-2007 police included a separate statistic for farm attacks and murders in their annual reports.

In the past decade the government’s attitude towards Afrikaans farmers as well as the European descended population has taken a 180 degree turn. The recording of farm attacks and murders were stopped in 2007 without explanation.

Then President Thabo Mbeki disbanded the commando units that same year giving the responsibility of protecting farms to the South African Police SAPs. It took eight years for the police to come up with a plan to protect farmers.

Up till 2007 the Democratic Alliance (DA) also actively supported the fight against farm attacks as reported by Mail and Guardian on 6 May 2007.

In another security-related motion, the congress called on the government to implement an effective policing policy in all rural areas, and to stop closing down commandos until sector policing units were in place.

Proposing that motion, the party’s safety and security spokesperson Diane Kohler-Barnard said it was completely unacceptable that farmers, who fed the nation and had irreplaceable skills, should be left unprotected and exposed in the face of increasing farm attacks.

Why did the DA stop supporting the fight against farm attacks in South Africa? Political incorrect to support the White minority in South Africa? Gain support of the masses by only addressing the issue of “ordinary crime”?

“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” – Albert Einstein


Photo Credit

South Africa Today – South Africa News